Check out this excerpt of the NPR interview Quentin
Tarantino gave with Terry Gross on Fresh Air.
He talks about his film Django Unchained. This section deals with the
way directors usually present films about history and how he felt his approach
was much more real and of course, exciting. Here it is from the horse’s mouth —
which is always a good way to try to discern what’s on somebody’s mind.
I enjoyed the film thoroughly — what about you?
GROSS: Is it a coincidence, is it any coincidence that after
taking on World War II and the Nazis in "Inglourious Basterds," you
set your new movie in the time of American slavery? So you've taken two
absolutely horrible chapters in history whereas, you know, your other films are
contemporary; you know, set it contemporary times. So what made you want to
take on just like, two just abhorrent chapters of history?
TARANTINO: Because I actually thought they would be really
good stories. I've had both stories in my head for a while. It just took them a
while to sit in the incubator until they were ready. And "Inglourious
Basterds" popped out first, and then it really set the stage for
"Django." But I like the idea of telling these stories and taking
stories that oftentimes, if played out in the way that they're normally played
out, just end up becoming soul-deadening because you're just watching
victimization all the time. And now, you get a chance to put a spin on it and
actually take a slave character, give him an heroic journey, make him heroic,
make him give his payback, and actually show this epic journey; and give it the
kind of folkloric tale that it deserves, the kind of, you know, grand opera
stage it deserves.
GROSS: So there's a lot of violence in your movie. Slaves
are being whipped and tortured, slaves forced to fight to the death like
gladiators, lots of shooting and splatter. So what are your - how do I put this
exactly? What are your limits for, like - what's your sensibility for how much
splatter, how much violence, how much sadism feels like right, like it's part
of the genre, like there's a certain, like, style to it that you're trying to
express? And what's going to the point of, like, past where you want to go, to
the point of, like, revulsion and exploitation to, you know, to a degree that's
just - I don't want to use the word immoral but just, you know, bad?
TARANTINO: Well frankly, I mean, you know, what happened
during slavery times is a thousand times worse than I show. So if I were to
show it a thousand times worse, to me that wouldn't be exploitative; that would
just be how it is. If you can't take it, you can't take it.
Now I didn't want - I wasn't trying to do a
"Schindler's List" you-are-there-under-the-barbed-wire-of-Auschwitz
kind of movie. I wanted the film to be more entertaining than that. Like I
said, I wanted it to be an exciting adventure movie.
But there's two types of violences in this film: There's the
brutal reality of the violence that slaves lived under, under the slavery laws,
245 years. And then there's the violence of Django's retribution. And that's
movie violence, and that's fun, and that's cool, and that's really enjoyable.
It's kind of what you're waiting for.
Quentin Tarantino Talks about Django Unchained on Fresh Air -- Listen to the entire interview.
2 comments:
I went to see this movie last Friday with 3 other seniors. While the lights were off I thought the theator was full of young people but to my surprise there was more people my age and older and we all enjoyed the movie (even my husband). I did turn my head at some of the bloody scenes thou.
MaDear
This is a phenomenal film. Tarantino managed to capture the love story, the revenge, the horrors of slavery and the comedy -- and add in some hip hop set against the 1860s, and you can help but see it as a work of art. I loved it! I'm glad you all enjoyed it.
alicia
Post a Comment